Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between the group with LV subclinical dysfunction and the group without LV subclinical dysfunction. Values are reported as mean (SD) and percentage % with number “n

From: Right ventricle involvement in patients with breast cancer treated with chemotherapy

Baseline (T0)

Patients with subclinical

dysfunction (relative reduction GLS > 15%)

n = 27

NO subclinical dysfunction

n = 51

p-value

Age

55 (9.7)

54.7 (10.7)

0.9

Cigarette smoke % (n)

41% (11)

45% (23)

0.7

Hypertension % (n)

41% (11)

27% (14)

0.2

Type 2 diabetes % (n)

7% (2)

4% (2)

0.5

Dyslipidemia % (n)

26% (7)

4% (2)

0.003

Obesity % (n)

11% (3)

10% (5)

0.8

Family History of CVD % (n)

26% (7)

12% (6)

0.1

ACE-I % (n)

19% (5)

6% (3)

0.08

ARBs % (n)

11% (3)

4% (2)

0.2

Beta-blockers % (n)

19% (5)

6% (3)

0.08

Diuretics % (n)

11% (3)

4% (2)

0.2

Calcium antagonists % (n)

7% (2)

0

-

Statins % (n)

15% (4)

4% (2)

0.08

Acetylsalicylic acid % (n)

4% (1)

6% (3)

0.7

RV-FWLS (%)

-27.2 (4.0)

-25.5 (3.3)

0.0430

RV GLS (%)

-22.4 (2.8)

-21.9 (2.1)

0.3577

RV-3DEF (%)

63.2 (3.7)

63.6 (4.0)

0.6567

TAPSE (%)

22.7 (2.7)

22.1 (2.9)

0.2551

RV-S’ (%)

13.6 (1.7)

13.5 (2.4)

0.5695

FAC (%)

50.2 (9.0)

49.6 (4.1)

0.5298

  1. RV-FWLS Right ventricle free wall longitudinal strain, RV-GLS Right ventricle global longitudinal strain, RV-3DEF Right ventricle 3d ejection fraction, TAPSE Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, RV-S’ Right ventricle s’, FAC Fractional area change