Skip to main content

Table 3 Cardiac monitoring among 80 childhood and young adult cancer survivors with low left ventricular ejection fraction

From: Approaches for monitoring and treating cardiomyopathy among cancer survivors following anthracycline or thoracic radiation treatment

Monitoring

N (%)

LVEF 50–54.9%

N = 38 (47.5%)

LVEF 41–49.9%

N = 18 (25.0%)

LVEF < 41%

N = 24 (30.0%)

P-valuea

Cardiology referral

56 (70.0)

20 (52.6)

14 (77.8)

22 (91.7)

0.003

Additional testing

  Any test

77 (96.3)

38 (100.0)

16 (88.9)

23 (95.8)

0.123

  Electrocardiogram

71 (88.8)

35 (92.1)

14 (77.8)

22 (91.7)

0.246

  Holter monitor

10 (12.5)

4 (10.5)

1 (5.6)

5 (20.8)

0.293

  Echocardiogram stress test

26 (32.5)

10 (26.3)

8 (44.4)

8 (33.3)

0.398

  Nuclear stress test

5 (6.3)

0 (0.0)

1 (5.6)

4 (16.7)

0.030

  Pharmacological nuclear stress test

4 (5.0)

1 (2.6)

2 (11.1)

1 (4.2)

0.387

  MUGA scan

4 (5.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (16.7)

1 (4.2)

0.027

  Cardiac MRI

18 (22.5)

9 (23.7)

4 (22.2)

5 (20.8)

0.966

  Angiogram

22 (27.5)

4 (10.5)

7 (38.9)

11 (45.8)

0.005

Echocardiogram follow-up interval

    

 < 0.001

  < 1 year

6 (7.5)

0 (0.0)

1 (5.6)

5 (20.8)

 

  1 year

62 (77.5)

27 (71.1)

17 (94.4)

18 (75.0)

 

  > 1 year

12 (15.0)

11 (28.9)

0 (0.0)

1 (4.2)

 
  1. LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction, N number, MUGA multi-gated acquisition, MRI magnetic resonance imaging
  2. aCalculated from chi-square tests assessing differences in outcomes between LVEF categories. Statistical tests were two-tailed