From: Quantitative assessment of radiotherapy-induced myocardial damage using MRI: a systematic review
Study | Patients | Cancer type | Decrease | Increase | Constant | Dose dependent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Machann et al.,[49] | 31 | HL | - | 26% and 3% of the whole cohort demonstrated ischemic and cardiomyopathic late enhancement, respectively at 24 years post-RT | - | - |
Van Der Velde et al., [50] | 80 | HL & NHL | - | In 25% of patients at 20 years post-RT. | - | - |
Traber et al., [51] | 10 | Thoracic malignancy | - | - | Only 2 patients (out of 10) demonstrated LGE at the baseline with no other LGE findings during RT | - |
Bergom et al.,[48] | 20 | Breast | - | - | No LGE was observed at 8.3 years. | - |
Takagi et al., [57] | 24 | Esophagus | - | LGE changes were noticed at 1.5 year follow up among 79% of participants (7% vs 78%, P<0.01) | No significant prevalence of LGE at 0.5 year follow up (p=0.16) | - |
Tahir et al., [55] | 66 | Breast | - | - | No LGE at all timepoints for both treatments | - |
Umezawa et al.,[67] | 24 | Esophagus | - | Higher LGE percentage in 60 Gy dose line (21.21%), and 40 Gy dose line (15.38%) in 12 of 24 patients who demonstrated LGE increased in 23.5 months | 0% LGE percentage at segments out of the radiation field | - |
Umezawa et al.,[56] | 19 | Esophagus | At 6 months: -0.2% signal decrease corresponding to 0-10 Gy At 1.5 year: -0.8%, -3.2%, -1.9%, -4.4% signal decrease corresponding to 0-10 Gy, 10-20 Gy, 20-30 Gy, 30-40 Gy, respectively. | At 6 months: 0.4%, 1.1%, 5.7%, 35.7%, and 38.1% signal increase corresponding to 10-20 Gy, 20-30 Gy, 30-40 Gy, 40-50 Gy, and 50-60 Gy, respectively. At 1.5 year: 17.5%, and 20.1% signal increase corresponding to 40-50 Gy, and 50-60 Gy, respectively. | - | A progressive increase of signal was noted at >30 Gy at both time points (6 months and 1.5 year). |
Huang et al., [68] | 7 | Lymphoma & esophagus | - | - | - | 1) A linear relation between LA scar-enhanced volume and mean dose with an average LA scar volume of 2.5 cm3 and average mean dose of 25.9 Gy (R2 = 0.8514, p=0.03) at 3.1 years. 2) linear relation between radiation received by the cardiac tissue and the ratio of (LA scar/LA wall) at 3.1 years. |
Burke et al., [60] | 11 | Esophagus | - | LGE was noted at the subepicardial and mid-wall after 3-5 months following therapy | - | - |
Mukai-Yatagai et al., [64] | 1 | Esophagus | - | - | No signs of LGE at 8 years | - |
Ricco et al., [62] | 28 | Chest tumor | - | LGE noted in 9/28 patients of 2.3 ml (0.2-6.1), at left myocardium or septum at 46.4 months. |  | - |
de Groot et al.,[63] | 40 | Esophagus | - | - | No significant difference between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and control group at 67.6 months post-RT | - |
Lideståhl et al.,[53] | 21 | Lung | - | - | No visual signs of LGE were detected at 2- and 6-month post-RT | - |
de Goyet et al.,[58] | 81 | Leukemia, HL, NHL, sarcoma, and other cancers | - | At 2-year follow-up (4.4±2%) compared to baseline (4.0±1.6%), P<0.05 | Between baseline (4.0±1.6%) and 1-year follow-up (4.3±2) | Increase of LV myocardial scarring (0.4±1.5%, P<0.05) at 2-year follow-up was correlated with the radiation dose received by 20% of volume of the LV (11.9±4.0 Gy; r=0.85; P<0.05). |