Skip to main content

Resistance to antihypertensive drugs targeting Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System in cancer patients: a case series


Hypertension impacts overall prognosis in cancer patients. There are no specific recommendations for its management in these patients. We report a case series of 5 cancer patients with suboptimal BP lowering and even worsening BP with ACEi or ARBs that improved to normal upon discontinuation of these drugs.

Learning points

  • Hypertension is one of the most common comorbidities significantly impacting prognosis in cancer patients but still there are no specific recommendations for its management in these patients.

  • Antihypertensive drugs targeting the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) are commonly used for management of hypertension in cancer patients. Preclinical studies in rats have demonstrated suboptimal blood pressure lowering effects of these agents in severe hypertension, however clinical experience with use of these agents for management of hypertension in cancer patients has never been reported.

  • Our study involved 5 cancer patients with uncontrolled hypertension managed with Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) that later improved to normal upon discontinuation of these drugs.

  • There are very few current studies that have reported beneficial outcomes in patients on anti-angiogenic based cancer therapy with specific anti-hypertensive medication classes. Clinical experience with the use of specific anti-hypertensive medication classes in patients with cancer needs to be reported in a disciplined fashion.


Hypertension is one of the most common comorbidities reported in cancer patients. Chemotherapeutic agents, especially VEGF signaling pathway (VSP) inhibitors can not only worsen but cause de novo hypertension [1]. There are no specific recommendations for management of hypertension in cancer patients despite its significant impact on prognosis compared to any of the other cardiovascular risk factors in these patients [2]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are most commonly used to manage hypertension. Dirix et al. [3] reported continued increase in blood pressure (BP) despite addition of an ACEi in a 51-year old male with renal cell carcinoma until treated successfully with a long acting nitrate. Thus their efficacy in reducing BP in cancer patients needs further exploration. Herein we present a case series of five cancer patients with uncontrolled hypertension while being managed with ACEi or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs), which became controlled after discontinuation of these drugs. Baseline characteristics of these patients are indicated in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Series Patients

We reviewed the charts of 5 adult cancer patients with resistant hypertension on ACEi and/or ARBs presenting to our cardio-oncology clinic over a 2-year period. The mean of 3 clinic or 2-week ambulatory blood pressure readings before starting each BP medication, after starting it, following any dose change, and after discontinuation of these drugs were recorded. All 5 patients were adherent with their medications, had laboratory workup for secondary hypertension in our cardio-oncology clinic, and had normal renal artery duplex scans.

Case 1

A 77-year-old African-American female with history of IgG-Kappa multiple myeloma, aplastic anemia with Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (requiring multiple transfusions) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), presented for management of uncontrolled hypertension while being treated with bortezomib chemotherapy. Her BP log revealed systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) ranges of 180-190 mmHg and 70-80 mmHg respectively, on an antihypertensive regimen including lisinopril 20 mg daily, felodipine 10 mg daily and spironolactone 25 mg daily. Her BPs remained elevated and increased even further on higher dose lisinopril of 40 mg daily. Lab data revealed elevated creatinine. After extensive workup, lisinopril was discontinued and carvedilol 12.5 mg and hydralazine 25 mg twice daily were added to her BP regimen. Her creatinine levels subsequently improved with improved BP readings ranging from 125 to 135/60-65 mmHg (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison of average SBP and DBP readings in: Case 1. 77 year-old female with multiple myeloma on chemotherapy with bortezomib. Graph shows SBP and DBP on low, high dose, and off ACEi therapy. Case 2. 85 year-old male on ADT with leuprolide and EBRT for prostate cancer. Graph shows SBP and DBP on low, high dose, and off ACEi therapy. Case 3. 79 year-old female on bevacizumab immunotherapy for ovarian carcinosarcoma. Data shows SBP and DBP before and after starting ACEi therapy and after discontinuing it. Case 4. 65 year-old female on chemotherapy with bevacizumab for ovarian cancer. Data shows SBP and DBP DBP before and after starting ACEi therapy and after discontinuing it. Case 5. 72 year-old female on cancer therapy with trastuzumab for breast cancer. Data shows SBP and DBP on and later off ACEi and ARB therapies

Case 2

An 85-year-old Caucasian male with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities (coronary artery disease, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), DM, abdominal aortic aneurysm and brain aneurysm), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Aplastic anemia, was treated with External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with Leuprolide for prostate cancer with multiple bone metastases. He presented to our cardio-oncology clinic for management of uncontrolled hypertension with SBP ranges of 140-150 mmHg. His anti-hypertensive regimen included spironolactone 25 mg daily, amlodipine 5 mg daily and lisinopril 20 mg daily. Amlodipine was discontinued due to significant lower extremity edema, and lisinopril was increased to 40 mg daily. Subsequent 2-week BP log revealed increased SBP readings to a range of 150-160 mmHg. Lisinopril was then discontinued and hydralazine was added to his BP regimen. At a dose of 50 mg QID, his BP readings normalized to 125–135/70-80 mmHg (Fig. 1).

Case 3

A 79-year-old Caucasian female with BRCA2 gene mutation and Stage IIIC ovarian carcinosarcoma was referred for management of uncontrolled hypertension while on bevacizumab targeted therapy. Her BP was well controlled with spironolactone 25 mg daily and metoprolol succinate 25 mg BID. However due to concerns for bradycardia (HR 40–60 per min), metoprolol was discontinued. Following this, her SBP readings were slightly elevated in range of 140-150 mmHg, so lisinopril 10 mg daily was initiated. The patient’s SBP remained elevated and in fact worsened, ranging from 160 to 180 mmHg despite an increase in lisinopril dose to 20 mg daily. Lisinopril was then discontinued, and her BP readings normalized to 120–130/60-80 mmHg after re-initiation of low dose metoprolol succinate 25 mg BID (Fig. 1).

Case 4

A 65-year-old Caucasian female with history of stage IV ovarian cancer presented with uncontrolled BP since she began treatment with bevacizumab and cyclophosphamide. Her hypertension had been well managed on carvedilol 12.5 mg BID prior to bevacizumab therapy, but she now had elevated BPs in the range of 160 s/90s on this drug. Lisinopril 20 mg daily was initiated for control of her bevacizumab-induced hypertension; but her BPs increased further, ranging from 170 to 180/85-115 mmHg. Lisinopril was subsequently discontinued, and she was initiated on BP therapy with amlodipine 5 mg daily. Following this change, her home BP readings significantly improved, with subsequent ranges of 120–140/80-90 mmHg (Fig. 1).

Case 5

A 72-year-old Caucasian female with history of breast cancer s/p surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy, DM, and dyslipidemia, presented for management of uncontrolled hypertension while on cancer therapy with trastuzumab. Her SBP and DBP readings were found to be between 190 and 210 mmHg and 80–90 mmHg respectively on metoprolol 100 mg daily, lisinopril 40 mg daily, hydralazine 75 mg TID, and chlorthalidone 25 mg daily. Her antihypertensive regimen was adjusted to carvedilol 25 mg BID, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg daily, amlodipine 10 mg daily and losartan 50 mg daily due to chronic cough on lisinopril. Losartan was later increased to 100 mg daily but BP remained elevated, and even worsened on this regimen (Fig. 1). Losartan was finally switched to nifedipine 120 mg daily; after which her BP readings declined to 120–140/70-80 mmHg.


Hypertension is the most common comorbidity seen in cancer patients. In fact many studies have shown it to be a risk factor for cancer due to abnormal proliferative pathways [4]. Cancer therapeutic agents such as bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, etc. are known to increase BP by decreasing endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production due to VEGF inhibition [5]. Trastuzumab, which is a humanized monoclonal antibody against HER2, also decreases VEGF expression [6]. EBRT causes a decrease in bioavailability of NO by impairing endothelium-dependent vasodilation of conduit arteries [7]. Other cancer therapies such as leuprolide can also cause hypertension resulting in increased cardiovascular events [8].

We observed resistance to antihypertensive agents targeting RAAS (ACEi/ARB) in our cancer patients; a phenomenon also observed in African American patients treated with ACEi/ARB monotherapy for hypertension. All of our patients had a history of hypertension prior to being initiated on chemotherapy. Their BPs were uncontrolled on ACEi/ARB but normalized on discontinuation of these agents. All of these patients reported adherence with their medications and had normal renal artery duplex scans. None of the physical exam findings or laboratory values suggested other causes of secondary hypertension.

Three of our patients were on bevacizumab and trastuzumab, which are known to decrease VEGF expression. Preclinical experiments in rats have shown an inability of ACEi to modulate higher increases in BP induced by VEGF inhibition, and suggest effectiveness in treatment for only mild increases in BP (10–15 mmHg) [9]. They also observed reduced renin levels in the rats exposed to higher levels of cediranib (a potent VSP inhibitor), and thus concluded that RAAS gets downregulated to maintain normotension when exposed to these agents. Other preclinical studies have also shown suppression of RAAS by angiogenesis inhibition [5]. Thus, the significance of RAAS in mediating antiangiogenic therapy-induced hypertension is still controversial and other mechanisms such as inhibition of endothelial derived relaxation factors, capillary rarefaction and alteration in pressure-natriuresis relationship, as well as other vasoconstrictive pathways, play a major role [10]. Thus ACEi/ARBs can cause suboptimal BP lowering effects in cases of severe hypertension due to already suppressed RAAS in these patients. Nonetheless, in vivo studies have shown that ACEi increases release of NO and are thus recommended as first line agents for management of anti-VEGF induced hypertension [11]; especially for their renoprotective effects given higher risk of proteinuria on VSP inhibition therapy [12]. It is possible that BP control with ACEi/ARBs in this population occurs due to angiogenesis inhibition by RAAS antagonism and not due to their direct antihypertensive action.

Recommendations for agents best used in the management of hypertension in patients on cancer therapy are variable and somewhat controversial, particularly for those on VEGF inhibitors. ACEi/ARBs are commonly preferred in cancer patients due to improved mortality outcome [13, 14]. However, as discussed, these agents could lead to suboptimal BP lowering as a result of RAAS suppression; particularly in cases of severe VEGF inhibitor-induced hypertension. This mechanism is similar to that of the repressed RAAS system leading to ACEi/ARB resistant hypertension in persons of African ancestry [15], and is a possible explanation for the uncontrolled hypertension observed in our case 1. This patient was also on treatment with bortezomib – a proteasome inhibitor that can rarely cause endothelial dysfunction leading to hypertension and vascular dysfunction [16]. Case 2 was on cancer treatment with leuprolide ADT which is known to cause hypertension. However, the resistance to ACEi observed in Case 2 was contrary to expectation since both leuprolide and EBRT are implicated in causing hypertension by mechanisms related to impairment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation, thus, ACEi/ARBs were expected to be effective [7, 8]. All these patients showed resistance to ACEi/ARB on different cancer therapies with malignancy being the only commonality. Indeed, patients with various cancers are known to overexpress Angiotensin II receptor 1, which is involved in BP regulation [17].

Our clinical experience shows that for those patients resistant to ACEi/ARBs, peripheral arterial vasodilators like hydralazine and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) like amlodipine or nifedipine are more effective in managing hypertension in these patients. Curwen et al demonstrated reversal of marked captopril-resistant hypertension induced by cediranib in rats after treatment with nifedipine [10]. Clinical studies have also shown effective BP management with dihydropyridine CCBs after treatment with bevacizumab [18, 19]. In a recent study by Wiliany et al. including patients with mRCC, ACEi/ARBs were not associated with decreased BP during anti-VEGF TKI treatment while CCBs and potassium sparing diuretics were associated with significant reduction in BP [20]. Furthermore, long acting nitrates that increase NO bioavailability have also been shown to effectively control hypertension in patients on antiangiogenic therapy that was refractory to ACEi and CCBs [3]. However, there is a potential risk of compromising antiangiogenic benefits as preclinical evidence suggest the role of endothelial NO production in VEGF associated angiogenesis [21, 22].

In conclusion, possible mechanisms of hypertension resistant to ACEi/ARB observed in certain cancer patients include overexpression of Angiotensin II receptor 1, low renin state or RAAS suppression. Thus, the efficacy of drugs targeting RAAS for BP control in this population on active VEGF-inhibitor or other cancer therapy is still unclear. Since there are no specific recommendations for management of hypertension in cancer patients, clinical experience with its management needs to be reported. The observation of difficult-to-treat hypertension with ACEi/ARBs in cancer patients on VSP inhibitor or other therapy requires further investigation.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.



Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme inhibitors


Angiotensin Receptor Blockers


Vascular Signaling Pathway


Human Epidermal Growth Factor receptor 2


Renal Cell Carcinoma


Diabetes Mellitus


Blood Pressure


Systolic Blood Pressure


Diastolic Blood Pressure


4 times daily


Heart rate


Plasminogen activator inhibitor


Nitric Oxide


Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System


Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor


Calcium channel blockers


  1. Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I, Grove L, Spitznagel EL Jr. Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2441–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meacham LR, Chow EJ, Ness KK, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in adult survivors of pediatric cancer--a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19(1):170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dirix LY, Maes H, Sweldens C. Treatment of arterial hypertension (AHT) associated with angiogenesis inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(6):1121–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamet P. Cancer and hypertension. An unresolved issue. Hypertension. 1996;28(3):321–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kappers MHW, van Esch JHM, Sluiter W, Sleijfer S, Danser AHJ, van den Meiracker AH. Hypertension induced by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib is associated with increased circulating endothelin-1 levels. Hypertension. 2010;56(4):675–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Le X-F, Mao W, Lu C, et al. Specific blockade of VEGF and HER2 pathways results in greater growth inhibition of breast cancer xenografts that overexpress HER2. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(23):3747–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beckman JA, Thakore A, Kalinowski BH, Harris JR, Creager MA. Radiation therapy impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(3):761–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levine GN, D’Amico AV, Berger P, et al. Androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and American urological association: endorsed by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. Circulation. 2010;121(6):833–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Curwen JO, Musgrove HL, Kendrew J, Richmond GHP, Ogilvie DJ, Wedge SR. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-a signaling induces hypertension: examining the effect of cediranib (recentin; AZD2171) treatment on blood pressure in rat and the use of concomitant antihypertensive therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):3124–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson ES, Khankin EV, Karumanchi SA, Humphreys BD. Hypertension induced by vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway inhibition: mechanisms and potential use as a biomarker. Semin Nephrol. 2010;30(6):591–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pande A, Lombardo J, Spangenthal E, Javle M. Hypertension secondary to anti-angiogenic therapy: experience with bevacizumab. Anticancer Res. 2007;27(5B):3465–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Derosa L, Izzedine H, Albiges L, Escudier B. Hypertension and angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Rev. 2016;10(2):298.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. McKay RR, Rodriguez GE, Lin X, et al. Angiotensin system inhibitors and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(11):2471–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Song T, Choi CH, Kim MK, Kim M-L, Yun BS, Seong SJ. The effect of angiotensin system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers) on cancer recurrence and survival. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017;26(1):78–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brewster LM, Seedat YK. Why do hypertensive patients of African ancestry respond better to calciumblockers and diuretics than to ACE inhibitors and β-adrenergic blockers? Asystematic review. BMC Med. 2013;11(1).

  16. Waxman AJ, Clasen S, Hwang W-T, et al. Carfilzomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):e174519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasha F, Ramalingam L, Gollahon L, et al. Mechanisms linking the renin-angiotensin system, obesity, and breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019;26(12):R653–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mir O, Coriat R, Ropert S, et al. Treatment of bevacizumab-induced hypertension by amlodipine. Investig New Drugs. 2012;30(2):702–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Waliany S, Sainani KL, Park LS, Zhang CA, Srinivas S, Witteles RM. Increase in blood pressure associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor. JACC: CardioOncology. 2019;1(1):24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooke JP, Losordo DW. Nitric oxide and angiogenesis. Circulation. 2002;105(18):2133–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fukumura D, Gohongi T, Kadambi A, et al. Predominant role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(5):2604–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


No source of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MG did literature search and had major contribution in writing the manuscript. RV helped in extraction of patient data and contributed in writing the manuscript. TO managed these patients and edited the entire manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mishita Goel.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Patient’s consent obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goel, M., Varandani, R.S. & Okwuosa, T.M. Resistance to antihypertensive drugs targeting Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System in cancer patients: a case series. Cardio-Oncology 6, 15 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: